A few years ago, choosing a data platform was about storage limits and running reports. In 2025, the game has changed. Data speed is now business speed, and the platform running your analytics and AI determines how fast you can innovate, control Snowflake costs, and outpace competitors. Databricks and Snowflake are the two biggest names in this space, each offering a different path to turning data into a competitive edge. The real challenge is deciding which one fits your strategy better and how it fits into a modern implementation.
Picking between Databricks and Snowflake is less about comparing features and more about deciding how your business will compete. This guide shows you which platform can give you the advantage and where expert Snowflake consulting can help you in your data projects.
What is Databricks?

Created by the team behind Apache Spark, Databricks unifies data engineering, data science, and machine learning in a single “lakehouse” platform. It handles structured and unstructured data at scale, excelling in complex pipelines, streaming analytics, and AI/ML workloads. By 2025, new features like Agent Bricks for domain-specific AI agents, Lakebase for AI-native applications, and expanded Unity Catalog governance have turned it into a full data intelligence platform for both technical and business users.
What is Snowflake?

Snowflake redefined cloud data warehousing with its separate compute and storage architecture, making it easy to scale and manage. Originally built for SQL analytics, it has evolved into an AI Data Cloud supporting BI and advanced AI applications. In 2025, enhancements like Cortex AISQL, the Arctic LLM, document AI, and improved Python integration extend its reach to data scientists, while keeping its automation and strong data governance.
Databricks vs Snowflake: similarities
Both platforms have matured significantly by 2025, converging on several key capabilities that make them viable options for modern data architectures. Both offer:
- Cloud-native architecture with automatic scaling and multi-cloud deployment options
- Enterprise-grade security including encryption, compliance certifications, and granular access controls
- Data sharing capabilities for secure collaboration across teams and organizations
- Support for both structured and unstructured data with varying degrees of optimization
- Integration ecosystems connecting to popular BI tools, data orchestration platforms, and cloud services
- Pay-as-you-consume pricing models with cost optimization features
- Streaming data ingestion for real-time analytics and decision-making
- Machine learning capabilities though with different approaches and levels of sophistication
Databricks vs Snowflake: differences
While these platforms share similarities, their design and intended uses provide each with advantages in specific scenarios.
Performance
Snowflake is built for fast, predictable SQL at high concurrency. Multi-cluster warehouses and automatic optimization keep dashboards responsive. In June 2025, Snowflake introduced Adaptive Compute and Gen2 warehouses to further boost price-performance for interactive analytics.
Databricks is strongest on heavy transformations, ML, and streaming; Photon closes much of the SQL gap but still benefits from tuning.
Winner: Snowflake for interactive SQL/BI and concurrent users; Databricks for heavy data processing, ML, and low-latency streaming.
Scalability
Snowflake scales with virtual warehouses and multi-cluster warehouses that add or remove clusters automatically, suspend when idle, and resume on demand, which makes high-concurrency BI straightforward with little operational overhead. It is simple to run for many concurrent users and to hand over to a dedicated platform team as a service when internal capacity is limited.
Databricks scales massive distributed jobs and offers autoscaling and serverless options across jobs, SQL, and pipelines.
“Snowflake had great performance consistency and easier scaling… Databricks gave us the best bang for buck on large-scale transformations and streaming.”
Winner: Snowflake for easy, high-concurrency analytics; Databricks for large-scale data processing and ML.
Ease of Use
Snowflake is SQL-first with a clean web UI, so analysts can start fast, and most tuning is automatic.
Databricks is notebook- and code-centric, great for engineers and data scientists, but it asks more from the team. Across the data community, the pattern is consistent:
“Snowflake seems so much easier to manage … the fastest way to deliver stakeholder value,” while Databricks earns favour with teams that have deep technical know-how.
Winner: Snowflake for business users and quick deployment; Databricks for technical teams requiring flexibility
Security
Snowflake ships enterprise controls out of the box, including RBAC, dynamic masking, row access, encryption, and detailed usage history. In 2025, updates added Trust Centre email alerts for policy violations, and Access History plus built-in lineage views support auditing. These map closely to the control models used in Snowflake AI & data governance.
Databricks centralises security and lineage in Unity Catalog with fine-grained policies and customer-managed keys, now including attribute-based access control (ABAC) policies.
Winner: Snowflake for turnkey, compliance-ready governance; Databricks for flexible, policy-rich control across data and AI when you have the engineering depth.
Integration
Snowflake connects cleanly to the BI stack and runs data and native apps inside the platform. Its Marketplace and Native App Framework let vendors ship apps that run inside Snowflake, and 2025 updates expanded in-market apps and data products. These patterns are common in enterprise Snowflake implementations where BI is the primary interface.
Databricks, on the other hand, leans on open formats and APIs, integrating broadly with Spark tools, ML frameworks, and engines that read Delta or Iceberg (and even Snowflake for reads).
Winner: Snowflake for BI and in-platform apps; Databricks for ML/AI ecosystem depth and open, cross-engine interoperability.
AI
Snowflake integrates AI directly into the platform, allowing teams to call large language models (LLMs) directly from SQL through Cortex AISQL. It also offers its own Arctic LLM family and, starting in 2025, supports running Snowflake ML models within Native Apps.
Meanwhile, Databricks focuses on end-to-end AI application development. Its Mosaic AI Agent Framework enables retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and agent workflows, and it recently launched DBRX, an open LLM designed for enterprise customisation.
Winner: Snowflake for AI in analytics with governance and low MLOps overhead. Databricks for custom AI apps, agents, and RAG at scale.
Cost
Snowflake charges per-second compute with auto-suspend and clear usage views, which makes BI spend predictable when set up well. Cost visibility is built in through Snowsight dashboards, usage views, resource monitors, and new cost-anomaly detection, and Cortex AI features are metered by tokens with documented credit rates and guardrails like the 10% cloud-services threshold. Many teams add a layer of Snowflake FinOps and the Snowflake Savings Calculator to keep spend under tight control.
Databricks uses DBUs that vary by workload and tier; it can be cheaper for large, long-running pipelines if you actively tune and monitor. The company is phasing out the Standard tier on AWS and GCP with Premium becoming the base on October 1, 2025, which makes governance features standard but still requires active monitoring and optimisation for steady costs.
As one user said:
“DBU pricing is confusing; you need active monitoring to understand what work maps to which cost.”
Winner: Snowflake for clearer, more predictable analytics spend and native cost controls; Databricks for cost efficiency on large, long-running data engineering and ML when tuned well.
So, which one is better in 2025?
The decision between Databricks vs Snowflake ultimately depends on your organization's primary use cases, team composition, and strategic priorities.
Choose Snowflake if:
- Your primary focus is business intelligence, reporting, and governed analytics.
- You have mixed technical teams, including business analysts who need self-service capabilities on a managed Snowflake platform.
- You prioritise ease of use, quick deployment, and minimal maintenance overhead.
- Data governance, compliance, and security are top priorities with limited dedicated resources, making AI & data governance a core requirement.
- You need predictable, transparent pricing for analytical workloads with clear FinOps guardrails.
- Your AI initiatives involve augmenting existing analytics rather than building custom models from scratch.
Consider a hybrid approach if:
- You have both heavy ML/data science workloads AND extensive BI requirements
- Different teams have varying technical capabilities and use case requirements
- You're transitioning between platforms and need time to migrate workloads, often via staged migrations & integrations.
- Specific regulatory or data residency requirements dictate platform choice by region
Need expert guidance for your data platform decision?
Your data platform is not an IT purchase. It is a strategy decision. Our Snowflake consultants help data leaders design, build, and run modern platforms with a core focus on Snowflake and the surrounding stack. We handle migrations, performance tuning, FinOps, AI readiness and governance so your team spends smarter and stays compliant. We use the same delivery patterns proven in our success stories.
Let’s align your Snowflake platform to your strategy.
Talk to our Snowflake consultants →


%201.webp)

